Avast for mac vs sophos manual#
Avast for mac vs sophos software#
Avast for mac vs sophos download#
Avast for mac vs sophos windows#

Avast for mac vs sophos download#

In response to a query, the manufacturer stated that in the tested version the standard default configuration was still set to immediate validation during download and not after download as is the case with other products. Avast Security did indeed deliver error-free detection, but it slowed down the system in the test procedure by 73 seconds – that is too much.

F-Secure and Intego delayed the test procedure by 21 to 35 seconds. Bitdefender and Sophos Home did just as good a job at detection, but required as much as 6 to 13 seconds more time. All these packages also achieved the 100 percent mark in detection. Those levels are actually unnoticeable in everyday use. The security packages for consumer users from Kaspersky Lab, Trend Micro and Symantec added a load of a mere 1 to 2 additional seconds when copying and downloading. Using this method, it quickly becomes apparent which antivirus solution requires too many resources in everyday use, thereby slowing down a Mac system. The exactly identical copying procedure and the same downloads were then repeated with each security solution installed, and the times were measured. On the reference system, the copying took 147 seconds, and the downloads lasted 56 seconds. In addition, various downloads were performed, and these times were also recorded. In evaluating this criterion, the testers copied a selection of files on a reference system encompassing a volume of 27.28 GB, clocking the time necessary for the operation.

The fact that those days are now over can be seen in the test segment on speed. In the past, many Mac security packages demonstrated a conspicuously high system load. Lots of protection with a low system load Likewise, high detection rates among corporate solutions were reached by ESET, McAfee and Sophos. For consumer users, the packages from Bitdefender, Kaspersky Lab and Trend Micro demonstrated superb detection rates between 99 and 100 percent. While these are innocuous on a Mac, in a mixed network, malware could thus hide on a Mac – especially when it is used as a server.

Avast for mac vs sophos windows#

In an additional test, the detection performance of Windows files was also evaluated. Endpoint Security from McAfee experienced a minor detection error: 99.6 percent. The security package from Comodo only detected an unacceptable 38.1 percent.Īmong the solutions for corporate users, the products from ESET, SentinelOne and Sophos detected all attackers 100 percent. F-Secure delivered a somewhat weaker performance with 93.8 percent. Intego overlooked a few malware samples, yet still attained a good 99.4 percent. In the test involving packages for home users, a total of 6 out of 9 packages detected the 514 selected MacOS attackers: Avast, Bitdefender, Kaspersky Lab, Sophos, Symantec and Trend Micro. High detection rates for many security packages None of the security packages switched off the internal protection functions of MacOS Sierra. The solutions were installed in the test as additional protection for MacOS Sierra.

Avast for mac vs sophos software#

SentinelOne Next Generation Endpoint Security Software 2.0Īll versions were evaluated under identical iMacs running on MacOS Sierra 10.12.6. Kaspersky Lab Internet Security for Mac 18.0 The first 9 on the list are for home users: The laboratory of AV-TEST examined a total of 13 products under MacOS Sierra. Third-party antivirus engine ( Bitdefender)įriðrik Skúlason (second engine also with Dr.Put to the test: 9 products for home users, 4 solutions for business users *Protection via containment of untrusted executable code. Third-party antivirus engine (Kaspersky)

This means that the antivirus engine is made by another producer however, the malware signature and/or other parts of the product may (or may not) be done from the owner of the product itself.ĭesktop computers and servers Windows Company Many antivirus products use 'third-party antivirus engine'. The term ' Web protection' usually includes protection from: infected and malicious URLs, phishing websites, online identity (privacy) protection and online banking protection. The term ' Email Security' refers to the protection of emails from viruses and malware, while ' AntiSpam' refers to the protection from spam, scam and phishing attacks. The term ' CloudAV' refers to the ability of a product to automatically perform scans on the cloud.

Avast for mac vs sophos manual#

The term 'on-demand scan' refers to the possibility of performing a manual scan (by the user) on the entire computer/device, while 'on-access scan' refers to the ability of a product to automatically scan every file at its creation or subsequent modification.